Communication Disorders BS
Program Purpose
Because communication is fundamental to human connection and divine relationships, the Communication Disorders program at Brigham Young University is uniquely positioned to reflect the Savior's ministry of healing and lifting others. Our program prepares students to serve God by serving their fellow beings (see Mosiah 2:17) through the careful, compassionate study of speech, language, and hearing.
In alignment with the university's mission to develop students of faith, intellect, and character, our curriculum seamlessly bridges the secular and the sacred. As a student in the Communication Disorders program, you will:
- Integrate rigorous scientific reasoning and deep spiritual reflection in the study of speech, language, and hearing, cultivating the ability to discern truth as emerging disciple-scholars.
- Apply evidence-based practices, research investigation, Spirit-led discernment, and analytical problem-solving in preparation to serve others in professional and broader contexts.
- Become a Christlike and collaborative professional who fosters covenant belonging.
- Develop practices that sustain both present and lifelong Christ-centered learning, leadership, and service.
Whether you go on to work in schools and clinics as an assistant, or pursue advanced graduate studies in Speech-Language Pathology or Audiology, this program will equip you to make a profound impact. You will depart not merely as a competent professional, but as a consecrated leader prepared to ease burdens, strengthen families, and foster belonging in your community.
Curricular Structure
The undergraduate curriculum provides students with the necessary foundation of knowledge and skills to prepare them to further their education and professional training at the graduate level. The minimum requirement for entry into the field of speech-language pathology is a master's degree; a clinical doctorate is required to enter the profession of audiology. The reader is referred to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (https://hearingandspeechcareers.org/) for more detailed information. The B.S. program consists of 51 hours of coursework.
Co-Curricular Structure
COMD 495R provides experiences outside the classroom in a mentoring environment. In addition, individual faculty members provide several mentoring activities for our undergraduates. These include formal mentoring grants provided by the University and the David O. McKay School of Education, as well as informal mentoring through undergraduate teaching and research experiences.
Further information may be obtained at the following web links:
Learning Outcomes
The goals and expected learning outcomes of the Communication Disorders B.S. program align with institutional goals and objectives. The program builds on the mission of the University while adhering to its own mission statement and learning outcomes.
The mission of the Communication Disorders Department is that
We build belonging, achievement, and growth through Christlike service to:
- Empower lifelong learners
- Engage in impactful research
- Provide compassionate, evidence-based clinical care
The Communication Disorders' Core Values are Belonging, Becoming, Collaboration, Kindness
The goals and outcomes of the graduate program in Communication Disorders are based on the professional preparation of speech-language pathologists with a focus on nine key areas of clinical knowledge and skills along with additional preparation. The undergraduate program emphasizes the typical development of speech, language, and hearing and the necessary skills for understanding normal function. Unlike the graduate program, the undergraduate program specifically excludes preparation in the assessment and treatment of speech and language disorders.
Learning, Thinking, and Discerning TruthIntegrate rigorous scientific reasoning and deep spiritual reflection in the study of speech, language, and hearing, cultivating the ability to discern truth as emerging disciple-scholars
Apply evidence-based practices, research investigation, Spirit-led discernment, and analytical problem-solving in preparation to serve others in professional and broader contexts.
Become a Christlike and collaborative professional who fosters covenant belonging
Develop practices that sustain both present and lifelong Christ-centered learning, leadership, and service.
Evidence of Learning
Archiving of assessment tools for the undergraduate program include computer archiving of course grades (university level archiving) and computer archiving within the department of the Annual Alumni Survey, external reviews, Senior Survey, and the National Assessment of Student Engagement.
Assessment Tools
- Specific assignments (as above)
- Alumni Survey
- Senior Survey
Learning and Teaching Assessment and Improvement
Program assessment data are analyzed and reviewed annually during the week preceding the first semester of the new academic year. The faculty meets to set priorities for the formulation of programmatic changes. Subsets of the faculty may be responsible for specific items. They will meet and subsequently make recommendations to the entire faculty. If changes are made, these changes are brought to the college curriculum committee and then to the university curriculum committee.
Individual course assignments and examinations are, in addition to being a measure of student learning, a measure of the student's progress towards program completion.
The annual alumni survey serves as a gauge of student attitudes and program perceptions. Information obtained from this survey is used, in part, to evaluate our effectiveness in supporting the broader goals and outcomes of the university. Frequently, we find that this information leads to "soft" adjustments within the program. For example, the availability of faculty and resources may be adjusted based on this feedback.
The National Assessment of Student Engagement provides significant information regarding the impact of our undergraduate program. The information from this survey evaluates program effectiveness over a broad range of student activities, evaluating both their attitudes and the depth of their education. It provides an indication of our ability to provide meaningful educational experiences to our students. It also allows comparison with other programs within our own university and other universities across the nation. Changes in course curriculum and student engagement activities that relate to mentoring, out of classroom experiences, and student-faculty interaction have resulted from the annual review of this document by the faculty.
Formal unit assessments which include university, college, and departmental accreditations are most helpful as we complete strategic planning, review student, faculty, and departmental policy and procedures, and work on curriculum planning. University self-studies provide information to the department that allows us to review and update faculty and student standards in broad areas and execute course corrections that help maintain a high quality of education and a strong academic environment.

