Civil Engineering BS

Program Purpose


The purpose of the undergraduate Civil Engineering program is to produce graduates who possess technical competence in their chosen specialty area of civil engineering, integrity, and a commitment to the principles of the gospel of Jesus Christ, that will prepare them to serve and contribute as innovators, professional engineers, and leaders in the global community.

Curricular Structure

Major Academic Plan (MAP)

Undergraduate Catalog

Objectives

Graduates of the Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering program will become: 

  1. Disciples of Jesus Christ who seek higher purpose and divine inspiration in their personal and professional lives. (Spiritually Strengthening)
  2. Engineers who competently apply and innovate technical methods to plan, design, construct, operate, and maintain the built environment. (Intellectually Enlarging)
  3. Leaders with moral character and integrity who are responsible stewards of God's divine Creation and the safety and welfare of His children. (Character Building)
  4. Citizens who seek knowledge and serve their communities, their profession, and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Leading to Lifelong Learning and Service)

Amended by faculty vote with Industry Advisory Council and student feedback March 2026.

Learning Outcomes


Problem Solving applying Math and Science

1) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics.

Courses that Contribute: CE CE 331 CE 351 CE EN 103 CE EN 203 CE EN 204 CE EN 321 CE EN 341
Linked to BYU Aims: Intellectually Enlarging
Design and Contemporary Issues

2) An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors.

Courses that Contribute: CE 421 CE EN 306 CE EN 424 CE EN 433 CE EN 442 CE EN 461 CE EN 472
Linked to BYU Aims: Character Building
Communication

3) An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences.

Courses that Contribute: CE EN 112 CE EN 170 CE EN 231 CE EN 304 CE EN 306 CE EN 472
Linked to BYU Aims: Intellectually Enlarging
Ethics, Faith and Sustainability

4) An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.

Courses that Contribute: CE EN 201 CE EN 231 CE EN 421
Linked to BYU Aims: Character Building
Teamwork

5) An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.

Courses that Contribute: CCE 102 CE EN 231 CE EN 304 CE EN 306 CE EN 472
Linked to BYU Aims: Spiritually Strengthening
Experiments and Data

6) An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions.

Courses that Contribute: CCE 122 CE 351 CE EN 170 CE EN 214 CE EN 304 CE EN 306 CE EN 321 CE EN 332 CE EN 341
Linked to BYU Aims: Intellectually Enlarging
Life-long Learning and Service

7) An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.

Courses that Contribute: CE EN 200A CE EN 231 CE EN 400B CE EN 472
Linked to BYU Aims: Lifelong Learning and Service

Evidence of Learning


The program objectives and learning outcomes are reviewed through a formal assessment strategy. The primary tools used for assessment are as follows:

Direct: Graded Coursework Items

Embedded indicators from the courses include graded items such as exam questions, laboratory assignments, projects, and key homework problems.

The program assesses each of its seven student outcomes using performance indicators and associated rubrics.

Each academic year, we assess and evaluate student learning outcomes based on the schedule in the table below. This rolling three-year schedule allows us to assess each student outcome twice during a six-year ABET evaluation cycle.

Assessment Schedule

 2024-252025-262026-272027-28
OutcomeWinterSp/SuFallWinterSp/SuFallWinterSp/SuFallWinterSp/Su
SO1: Complex Problems           A E   C    
SO2: Design     A A E C          
SO3: Communications           A E   C    
SO4: Ethics Assess Evaluate Change             A E
SO5: Teamwork     A A E C          
SO6: Experiments / Data Assess Evaluate Change             A E
SO7: Acquire Knowledge     A A E C          
ABET
ABET Schedule         Self-study Visit Response        

We attempt to assess each student outcome three times:

  1. At an Introductory level, ideally in a 100- or 200-level classroom setting.

  2. At a Reinforcing level, ideally in a 200-or 300-level classroom setting.

  3. At an Evaluation level, as close to graduation as possible.

A matrix mapping each student outcome to the courses is shown below.

 CCE102CCE103SoftwareMeasurementsCCE203CE232CCE270CE291BreadthDesignCapstone
1. Complex problems   I     R       E    
2. Design                   R E
3. Communication     I       R       E
4. Ethics I             R     E
5. Teamwork I             R     E
6. Experiments and data           R R   E*    
7. Acquire knowledge     I         R     E

Direct: Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Exam

Student learning with respect to specific outcomes is compared with that of students nationwide in this standardized exam.

Indirect: BYU Alumni Questionnaire

This questionnaire is administered to alumni three years after graduation and has been administered each year since 2000. The instrument asks alumni to rate themselves on specific, concrete self-descriptive statements and questions derived from official statements of university aims. Other items solicit alumni perceptions of the impact of their undergraduate experiences in terms of their spiritual, character and intellectual development. There are 10 Civil and Environmental department-specific questions.

Indirect: Advisory Board Review

Members of the Department Advisory Board provide feedback on the program objectives, learning outcomes, and assessment strategy during their semi-annual meetings on campus. Most of the members are industry leaders and department alumni.

Indirect: Exit Interviews

Student ratings of the success of the program in accomplishing the learning outcomes, as well as student opinions about the importance of each outcome, are solicited from a random set of seniors approaching graduation in Winter semester.

Indirect: Student Ratings of Courses

The university administers an end-of course survey to students. This survey allows for more open-ended responses and provides insight into the effectiveness of teaching. Students have an opportunity to respond to the effectiveness of learning activities, fairness of grading procedures, explanation of concepts, usefulness of feedback, degree of student involvement, time spent on homework and reading assignments, etc. Students may also include free-form comments about the course.

Indirect: BYU Senior Survey

This questionnaire is administered to graduating seniors has been administered each year since 2000. The instrument asks seniors to rate their experiences with specific questions derived from the CEEN department learning outcomes. Other items solicit perceptions of the impact of their undergraduate experiences in terms of their spiritual, character and intellectual development. There are 14 Civil and Environmental department-specific questions.

Learning and Teaching Assessment and Improvement


The assessment data are compiled and analyzed by the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee for periodic discussion with the faculty during monthly faculty meetings and as a standard component of the annual department retreat.